Harrington v. Taylor. | 36 SE2d 227 | December 12, 1945


This is the old version of the H2O platform and is now read-only. This means you can view content but cannot create content. You can access the new platform at https://opencasebook.org. Thank you.

Harrington v. Taylor.

36 S.E.2d 227
225 N.C. 690




No. 594.
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
Dec. 12, 1945.

[36 S.E.2d 227]

Appeal from Superior Court, Richmond County; Hubert E. Olive, Special Judge.

Action by Lena Harrington against Lee Walter Taylor on defendant's promise to pay damages for injuries sustained by plaintiff at hands of another when plaintiff intervened to save defendant's life. From a judgment for defendant, plaintiff appeals.


George S. Steele, Jr., of Rockingham, for plaintiff, appellant.

No counsel contra.


The plaintiff in this case sought to recover of the defendant upon a promise made by him under the following peculiar circumstances:

The defendant had assaulted his wife, who took refuge in plaintiff's house. The next day the defendant gained access to the house and began another assault upon his wife. The defendant's wife knocked him down with an axe, and was on the point of cutting his head open or decapitating him while he was laying on the floor, and the plaintiff intervened, caught the axe as it was descending, and the blow intended for defendant fell upon her hand, mutilating it badly, but saving defendant's life.

Subsequently, defendant orally promised to pay the plaintiff her damages; but, after paying a small sum, failed to pay anything more. So, substantially, states the complaint.

The defendant demurred to the complaint as not stating a cause of action, and the demurrer was sustained. Plaintiff appealed.

The question presented is whether there was a consideration recognized by our law as sufficient to support the promise. The Court is of the opinion that, however much the defendant should be impelled by common gratitude to alleviate the plaintiff's misfortune, a humanitarian act of this kind, voluntarily performed, is not such consideration as would entitle her to recover at law.

The judgment sustaining the demurrer is



Case Information

June 03, 2014


Per Curiam

36 SE2d 227, 225 NC 690


Supreme Court of North Carolina

Author Stats

H2O Case Admin.

Leitura Garamond Futura Verdana Proxima Nova Dagny Web
small medium large extra-large