This is the old version of the H2O platform and is now read-only. This means you can view content but cannot create content. You can access the new platform at https://opencasebook.org. Thank you.
Read Wilhelm Lubricating Co. v. Battrud, 197 Minn. 626, 268 N.W. 634, 106 A.L.R. 1279 (1936). How would both cases be decided under U.C.C. §§2-204(3), 2-311? See further Patterson, Analysis of Uniform Commercial Code 268-279, N.Y.L. Revision Commission, Leg. Doc. No. 65(c), 329-330 (1955); Comment, 23 U. Chi. L. Rev. 499 (1956).
June 02, 2014
126.96.36.199 Notes - Fairmont Glass Works v. Crunden-Martin Woodenware Co.
Kessler, Gilmore & Kronman
This is the old version of the H2O platform and is now read-only. This means you can view content but cannot create content. If you would like access to the new version of the H2O platform and have not already been contacted by a member of our team, please contact us at firstname.lastname@example.org. Thank you.