3.4.4.2 Notes - Goodman v. Dicker
This is the old version of the H2O platform and is now read-only. This means you can view content but cannot create content. You can access the new platform at https://opencasebook.org. Thank you.
1
NOTE
2The case is noted in 97 U. Pa. L. Rev. 731 (1949). See also 1 Corbin §205 (1963).
3In Prince v. Miller Brewing Co., 434 S.W.2d 232 (Tex. App. 1968) the court refused to follow Goodman or to apply §90 in a case where the franchise agreement in issue granted the franchisor unlimited discretion to terminate. See further the note to Chrysler v. Quimby.
Close
Expand
Annotated Text Information
June 02, 2014
3.4.4.2 Notes - Goodman v. Dicker
3.4.4.2 Notes - Goodman v. Dicker
-
Current Annotated Text
09/02/2012 at 19:17 by Kessler, Gilmore & Kronman
Author Stats
Kessler, Gilmore & Kronman
This is the old version of the H2O platform and is now read-only. This means you can view content but cannot create content. If you would like access to the new version of the H2O platform and have not already been contacted by a member of our team, please contact us at h2o@cyber.law.harvard.edu. Thank you.