3.4.11.2 Notes - Itek Corp. v. Chicago Aerial Industries, Inc.
This is the old version of the H2O platform and is now read-only. This means you can view content but cannot create content. You can access the new platform at https://opencasebook.org. Thank you.
1
Itek ultimately lost at trial. See Itek Corp. v. Chicago Aerial Industries, Inc., 274 A.2d 141 (Del. 1971), which discusses the types of evidence admissible to show whether the parties intended to enter into a binding agreement.
Close
Expand
Annotated Text Information
February 15, 2015
3.4.11.2 Notes - Itek Corp. v. Chicago Aerial Industries, Inc.
3.4.11.2 Notes - Itek Corp. v. Chicago Aerial Industries, Inc.
-
09/02/2012 at 19:27 by
Kessler, Gilmore & Kronman
-
Current Annotated Text
02/15/2015 at 20:46 by rauvinj
Author Stats
rauvinj
This is the old version of the H2O platform and is now read-only. This means you can view content but cannot create content. If you would like access to the new version of the H2O platform and have not already been contacted by a member of our team, please contact us at h2o@cyber.law.harvard.edu. Thank you.