XI.A. Action Versus Inaction
This is the old version of the H2O platform and is now read-only. This means you can view content but cannot create content. You can access the new platform at https://opencasebook.org. Thank you.
EDIT PLAYLIST INFORMATION
DELETE PLAYLIST
Edit playlist item notes below to have a mix of public & private notes, or:
MAKE ALL NOTES PUBLIC (0/2 playlist item notes are public) MAKE ALL NOTES PRIVATE (2/2 playlist item notes are private)-
1 Show/Hide More Moch Co. v. Rensselaer Water Co.--"The Failure to Supply Water During a Fire" Original Creator: Jonathan Zittrain Current Version: emastersIn questions of duty, should courts draw a distinction between inaction that has the consequence of harm, and positive action that creates harm? -
2 Show/Hide More Union Pacific Railway v. Cappier--"The Railroad that Ran Over a Man and Let Him Bleed to Death" Original Creator: Jonathan Zittrain Current Version: emastersShould non-negligent owners and operators of an instrumentality have a duty to assist individuals who are harmed by the instrumentality?
| Find Items |
Search below to find items, then drag and drop items onto playlists you own. To add items to nested playlists, you must first expand those playlists.
This is the old version of the H2O platform and is now read-only. This means you can view content but cannot create content. If you would like access to the new version of the H2O platform and have not already been contacted by a member of our team, please contact us at h2o@cyber.law.harvard.edu. Thank you.