XX.Supp. Supplemental Cases and Materials | Jonathan Zittrain | December 21, 2012


This is the old version of the H2O platform and is now read-only. This means you can view content but cannot create content. You can access the new platform at https://opencasebook.org. Thank you.

XX.Supp. Supplemental Cases and Materials

by Jonathan Zittrain Show/Hide
  1. 1 Show/Hide More Hector v. Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
    Original Creator: Jonathan Zittrain

    Plaintiff is injured by a defective pacemaker that had been implanted at defendant’s hospital. The plaintiff’s physician had performed the implantation. The defendant had ordered the pacemaker and delivered it to the surgery room; however, the model and type of pacemaker was specified by the plaintiff’s physician.

    Should a hospital be liable for defects in the medical products it furnishes in connection with a patient’s care and treatment?


Playlist Information

January 28, 2014

Author Stats

Jonathan Zittrain

Other Playlists by Jonathan Zittrain

Find Items

Search below to find items, then drag and drop items onto playlists you own. To add items to nested playlists, you must first expand those playlists.

Leitura Garamond Futura Verdana Proxima Nova Dagny Web
small medium large extra-large