VII.B. The Effect of Defendant's Infirmities and Limitations on the Standard | Jonathan Zittrain | June 14, 2011

H2O

This is the old version of the H2O platform and is now read-only. This means you can view content but cannot create content. You can access the new platform at https://opencasebook.org. Thank you.

VII.B. The Effect of Defendant's Infirmities and Limitations on the Standard

Original Creator: Jonathan Zittrain Current Version: Jonathan Zittrain Show/Hide
  1. 1 Show/Hide More McCarty v. Pheasant Run--"The Chained, But Unlocked, Sliding Door"
    Original Creator: Jonathan Zittrain
    Does a plaintiff's lack of care elevate the care expected of the defendant?
  2. 2 Show/Hide More Roberts v. Ramsbottom--"The Driver Who Had a Stroke"
    Original Creator: Jonathan Zittrain
    Should a medical episode absolve actors of their duty of care?
  3. 3 Show/Hide More Bashi v. Wodarz--"The Driver Who Wigged Out"
    Original Creator: Jonathan Zittrain
    Does mental illness count as a “sudden affliction” as defined in Roberts?
  4. 4 Show/Hide More Miller v. Reilly--"The Defective Brakes Case"
    Original Creator: Jonathan Zittrain
    Should an actor's standard of care be relaxed by exigent circumstances—such as her car's brakes failing while the actor is driving downhill?
Close

Playlist Information

May 21, 2013

Author Stats

Jonathan Zittrain

Other Playlists by Jonathan Zittrain

Find Items

Search below to find items, then drag and drop items onto playlists you own. To add items to nested playlists, you must first expand those playlists.

SEARCH
Leitura Garamond Futura Verdana Proxima Nova Dagny Web
small medium large extra-large