Special Litigation Committees | Brian JM Quinn | February 22, 2013

H2O

This is the old version of the H2O platform and is now read-only. This means you can view content but cannot create content. You can access the new platform at https://opencasebook.org. Thank you.

Special Litigation Committees

by Brian JM Quinn Show/Hide
In situations where demand is futile, shareholders can file derivative litigation without making demand. Does that mean that boards have forever lost control over the derivative litigation? In some circumstances the answer is no. The following cases lay out the doctrine with respect to how a board can retake control over derivative litigation in later stages. EDIT PLAYLIST INFORMATION DELETE PLAYLIST

Edit playlist item notes below to have a mix of public & private notes, or:

MAKE ALL NOTES PUBLIC (2/2 playlist item notes are public) MAKE ALL NOTES PRIVATE (0/2 playlist item notes are private)
  1. 1 Show/Hide More Zapata Corp. v. Maldonado
    Original Creator: Brian JM Quinn
    Special litigation committees and control over derivative litigation in later stages.
  2. 2 Show/Hide More In re Oracle Corp. Derivative Litigation
    Original Creator: Brian JM Quinn
    Special litigation committee
Close

Playlist Information

January 22, 2014

corporate derivative SLC shareholder litigation

Author Stats

Brian JM Quinn

Other Playlists by Brian JM Quinn

Find Items

Search below to find items, then drag and drop items onto playlists you own. To add items to nested playlists, you must first expand those playlists.

SEARCH
Leitura Garamond Futura Verdana Proxima Nova Dagny Web
small medium large extra-large