Jordi Weinstock and Henry Gutman, Spring 2015.
Course: Anatomy of a Copyright Case – an in-depth look at how landmark copyright cases progress from problem, to Complaint, to the Supreme Court of the United States. We plan to analyze two important copyright cases, working from actual case files, pleadings and briefs, to understand what happened and why, and to permit the students in the class to put themselves in the position of the attorneys handling the cases, as they attempt to develop winning strategies and arguments.EDIT PLAYLIST INFORMATION DELETE PLAYLIST
Edit playlist item notes below to have a mix of public & private notes, or:MAKE ALL NOTES PUBLIC (2/2 playlist item notes are public) MAKE ALL NOTES PRIVATE (0/2 playlist item notes are private)
|1||Show/Hide More||Sony Corp. of America v. Universal City Studios, Inc.|
|1.5.1||Show/Hide More||Harper & Row, Publishers v. Nation Enterprises, 471 U.S. 539 (1985)|
|1.5.2||Show/Hide More||Campbell v. Acuff-Rose Music, Inc., 510 U.S. 569 (1994)|
|1.5.3||Show/Hide More||Sony Computer Entertainment, Inc. v. Connectix Corp., 203 F.3d 596 (9th Cir. 2000)|
|1.5.4||Show/Hide More||Perfect 10 v. Amazon.com. 508 F.3d 1146 (CA9 2007) [Read Part III.C.]|
|2||Show/Hide More||Lotus Dev. Corp. v. Borland Int'l, Inc.|
January 20, 2015
This is the old version of the H2O platform and is now read-only. This means you can view content but cannot create content. If you would like access to the new version of the H2O platform and have not already been contacted by a member of our team, please contact us at email@example.com. Thank you.