This is the old version of the H2O platform and is now read-only. This means you can view content but cannot create content. You can access the new platform at https://opencasebook.org. Thank you.
Edit playlist item notes below to have a mix of public & private notes, or:
MAKE ALL NOTES PUBLIC (3/3 playlist item notes are public) MAKE ALL NOTES PRIVATE (0/3 playlist item notes are private)1 | Show/Hide More | V. A. Conditions and the Duty to Perform |
1.1 | Show/Hide More | V. A. 1. Express Conditions |
1.1.1 | Show/Hide More | Gray v. Gardner |
1.1.2 | Show/Hide More | Parsons v. Bristol Development Co. |
1.1.3 | Restatement § 22 |
1.2 | Show/Hide More | V. A. 2. Conditions and Promises |
1.2.1 | Show/Hide More | Jacob & Youngs, Inc. v. Kent. |
1.2.2 | Show/Hide More | Howard v. Federal Crop Ins. Corp. |
1.3 | Show/Hide More | V. A. 3. Constructive Conditions and the Order of Performance |
1.3.1 | Show/Hide More | Nichols v. Raynbred |
1.3.2 | Show/Hide More | Kingston v. Preston |
1.3.3 | Show/Hide More | Lafayette Place Associates v. Boston Redevelopment Authority |
1.3.6 | Show/Hide More | Conley v. Pitney Bowes |
1.3.7 | Show/Hide More | Stewart v. Newbury. |
1.3.8 | U.C.C. section 2-307 |
2 | Show/Hide More | V. B. Other Justifications for Non-Performance |
2.1 | Show/Hide More | V. B. 1. Impossibility and Impracticability |
2.1.1 | Show/Hide More | V. B. 1. a. Development of the Doctrine |
2.1.1.1 | Show/Hide More | Taylor v. Caldwell |
2.1.1.2 | Show/Hide More | Tompkins v. Dudley |
2.1.2 | Show/Hide More | V. B. 1. b. Modern Approach |
2.1.2.1 | Show/Hide More | American Trading & Production Corp. v. Shell International Marine Ltd. |
2.1.2.2 | Show/Hide More | Mishara Construction v. Transit-Mixed Concrete Corp. |
2.2 | Show/Hide More | V. B. 2. Frustration of Purpose |
2.2.1 | Show/Hide More | Chase Precast Corporation v. John J. Paonessa Company, Inc |
2.2.3 | Show/Hide More | Krell v. Henry |
2.3 | Show/Hide More | V. B. 3. The Code |
2.3.1 | U.C.C. §§ 2-614 to 2-616 |
3 | Show/Hide More | V. C. Unjustified Non-Performance and the Problem of Forfeiture |
3.1 | Show/Hide More | V. C. 1. The Perfect-Tender Rule and the Doctrine of Substantial Performance |
3.1.1 | Show/Hide More | Oshinsky v. Lorraine Mfg. Co. |
3.1.2 | Show/Hide More | Prescott & Co. v. J. B. Powles & Co. |
3.1.3 | Show/Hide More | Ramirez v. Autosport |
3.1.4 | Show/Hide More | Beck & Pauli Lithographing Co. v. Colorado Milling & Elevator Co. |
3.1.5 | Show/Hide More | Bartus v. Riccardi |
3.1.6 | U.C.C. § 2-508 |
3.1.7 | Show/Hide More | Plante v. Jacobs |
September 09, 2013
Charles Fried
Find Items |
Search below to find items, then drag and drop items onto playlists you own. To add items to nested playlists, you must first expand those playlists.
This is the old version of the H2O platform and is now read-only. This means you can view content but cannot create content. If you would like access to the new version of the H2O platform and have not already been contacted by a member of our team, please contact us at h2o@cyber.law.harvard.edu. Thank you.