This is the old version of the H2O platform and is now read-only. This means you can view content but cannot create content. You can access the new platform at https://opencasebook.org. Thank you.
State Antitrust Federal law grants to each attorney general the jurisdiction to enforce federal antitrust law. This statutory grant of “parens patriae” authority is both increasingly used and increasingly controversial. This class covers the federal and state jurisdiction of state attorneys general to pursue matters arising out of antitrust law.
EDIT PLAYLIST INFORMATIONDELETE PLAYLIST
Edit playlist item notes below to have a mix of public & private notes, or:
Since 1978, federal antitrust law explicitly authorizes state attorneys general to appear either singly or in conjunction with other states in federal court on a broad array of antitrust issues. When coupled with state law, most attorneys general have the jurisdiction to block mergers or seek direct or indirect damages on behalf of governmental agencies and citizens.
The legal ability to join together in a single federal court has led to many multistate antitrust actions where attorneys general are often joined by the U.S. Department of Justice, the Federal Trade Commission and by private litigants including particular companies and class counsel. These efforts are nonetheless limited by resources, unpredictable impacts on in-state businesses and by prudence. Virtually all state antitrust cases settle short of trial.
Even before the passage of the Affordable Care Act (“ACA”) that contains antitrust provisions (Accountable Care Organizations “ACO”), attorneys general have focused their single state antitrust attention to health related issues.
This is the old version of the H2O platform and is now read-only. This means you can view content but cannot create content. If you would like access to the new version of the H2O platform and have not already been contacted by a member of our team, please contact us at h2o@cyber.law.harvard.edu. Thank you.