This is the old version of the H2O platform and is now read-only. This means you can view content but cannot create content. You can access the new platform at https://opencasebook.org. Thank you.
Edit playlist item notes below to have a mix of public & private notes, or:
MAKE ALL NOTES PUBLIC (0/4 playlist item notes are public) MAKE ALL NOTES PRIVATE (4/4 playlist item notes are private)1 | Show/Hide More | Jurisdiction: Whose Crime is it Anyway? |
1.1 | Show/Hide More | Traditional Cyberlaw Jurisdiction |
1.1.1 | Show/Hide More | Zippo Mfg. Co. v. Zippo Dot Com Inc., 952 F. Supp. 1119 (W.D. Pa. 1997) |
1.2 | Show/Hide More | MegaUpload |
2 | Show/Hide More | Privacy: Who Watches the Watchmen? |
2.1 | Show/Hide More | N.S.A. |
2.2 | Show/Hide More | Katz v. United States, 389 U.S. 347 (1967) |
2.4 | Show/Hide More | California v. Greenwood |
2.7 | Show/Hide More | “Retroactive Immunity From The Gov't For Warrantless Wiretapping Deemed Constitutional," Mike Masnick, Techdirt (2011) [JUST THE ARTICLE] |
3 | Show/Hide More | Crowdsourcing/Gamification: All the World’s a Game, and All the Men and Women Merely Players |
4 | Show/Hide More | Cybersecurity: Outcoding the Red Queen |
September 11, 2013
Cyber Reading Group
Find Items |
Search below to find items, then drag and drop items onto playlists you own. To add items to nested playlists, you must first expand those playlists.
This is the old version of the H2O platform and is now read-only. This means you can view content but cannot create content. If you would like access to the new version of the H2O platform and have not already been contacted by a member of our team, please contact us at h2o@cyber.law.harvard.edu. Thank you.