X.A. The Basic Doctrine | Lydia Lichlyter | September 18, 2015

H2O

This is the old version of the H2O platform and is now read-only. This means you can view content but cannot create content. You can access the new platform at https://opencasebook.org. Thank you.

X.A. The Basic Doctrine

Original Creator: Jonathan Zittrain Current Version: Lydia Lichlyter Show/Hide
  1. 1 Show/Hide More Martin v. Herzog--"The Buggy Without Lights"
    Original Creator: Jonathan Zittrain Current Version: Lydia Lichlyter
    To what extent, if any, should courts allow the violation of a statute to inform their analysis of negligence?
    Notes:
    Plaintiff and her husband were driving a buggy on a highway in the darkness. During the drive, their buggy collided with the defendant’s automobile, killing the plaintiff’s husband. Plaintiff claimed the defendant was negligent for crossing the center line of the highway. The defendant claimed that he should not be at fault because plaintiff’s husband was driving without lights. There was a statute which required lights on cars when traveling in the dark.
Close

Playlist Information

September 18, 2015

Author Stats

Lydia Lichlyter

Student

Harvard Law School

Other Playlists by Lydia Lichlyter

Find Items

Search below to find items, then drag and drop items onto playlists you own. To add items to nested playlists, you must first expand those playlists.

SEARCH
Leitura Garamond Futura Verdana Proxima Nova Dagny Web
small medium large extra-large