XX.C. Manufacturing Defects Versus Design Defects | Lydia Lichlyter | September 18, 2015

H2O

This is the old version of the H2O platform and is now read-only. This means you can view content but cannot create content. You can access the new platform at https://opencasebook.org. Thank you.

XX.C. Manufacturing Defects Versus Design Defects

Original Creator: Jonathan Zittrain Current Version: Lydia Lichlyter Show/Hide
  1. 1 Show/Hide More Rix v. General Motors Corp. -- "The Truck that couldn't Brake"
    Original Creator: Jonathan Zittrain Current Version: Lydia Lichlyter
    This case contrasts manufacturing and design defects by analyzing each products liability theory in parallel.
    Notes:
    Plaintiff was injured when a truck hit him from behind due to its brake system falling apart. The truck was manufactured by the defendant motor corporation, but modified after-sale by the dealer. Due to the weight of the after-sale modification, it is possible that the accident would have occurred anyway as the installed brake system may have lacked sufficient braking power to stop the truck. However, at the time of purchase, the defendant motor corporation offered an alternative brake system that may have been powerful enough to stop the modified truck.
Close

Playlist Information

September 18, 2015

Author Stats

Lydia Lichlyter

Student

Harvard Law School

Other Playlists by Lydia Lichlyter

Find Items

Search below to find items, then drag and drop items onto playlists you own. To add items to nested playlists, you must first expand those playlists.

SEARCH
Leitura Garamond Futura Verdana Proxima Nova Dagny Web
small medium large extra-large