XXI.A. Design Defect and Warning | Lydia Lichlyter | September 18, 2015


This is the old version of the H2O platform and is now read-only. This means you can view content but cannot create content. You can access the new platform at https://opencasebook.org. Thank you.

XXI.A. Design Defect and Warning

Original Creator: Jonathan Zittrain Current Version: Lydia Lichlyter Show/Hide
  1. 1 Show/Hide More Soule v. General Motors Corp. -- "The Crumpling Toe Plate"
    Original Creator: Jonathan Zittrain Current Version: Lydia Lichlyter
    When identifying possible design defects, should courts use tests other than the “consumer expectation” test? If so, under what circumstances would the alternative test be appropriate?
    Plaintiff got into a car accident while driving a car manufactured by the defendant. During the accident, the force of impact caused the “toe plate” beneath the plaintiff's feet to crumple up and fracture her ankles. The plaintiff sued on the theory that defendant had defectively designed the toe plate, thereby ‘enhancing' the damages she would otherwise suffered in a car accident. After the plaintiff won at the trial level, defendant appealed the case on the grounds that the trial court had erroneously instructed the jury on the “consumer expectation” test, with regard to the alleged design defect.
  2. 2 Show/Hide More Camacho v. Honda Motor Co. -- "The Motorcycle without Crash Bars"
    Original Creator: Jonathan Zittrain Current Version: Lydia Lichlyter
    When applying a “reasonably safe” test, what factors should courts consider to determine whether a product design is reasonably safe?
    Plaintiff collided into an automobile while riding a motorcycle manufactured and designed by the defendant. Consequently, the plaintiff suffered serious leg injuries. The evidence suggested that the plaintiff's leg injuries would have been mitigated or avoided completely had the defendant incorporated “crash bars” into the design of the motorcycle. The plaintiff sued for the alleged design defect, along with an alleged failure to warn buyers of the existence of injury-mitigating crash bars.
  3. 3 Show/Hide More Linegar v. Armour of America, Inc. -- "The Incomplete Bulletproof Vest"
    Original Creator: Jonathan Zittrain Current Version: Lydia Lichlyter
    Should the “reasonably safe” test require manufacturers to only sell products that have the safest design possible?
    Plaintiffs are the surviving mother and child of a police officer killed in the line of duty. The decedent was shot to death while wearing a bulletproof vest manufactured and designed by the defendant. However, the evidence showed that all the bullets that hit the vest did not penetrate; the decedent was killed by a bullet which entered his body through the visibly unarmored sides of the vest. There was also evidence that the defendant sold other vest models which did shield the sides of the wearer.
  4. 4 Show/Hide More Hood v. Ryobi America Corp. -- "The Saw with Removed Bladeguards"
    Original Creator: Jonathan Zittrain Current Version: Lydia Lichlyter
    Should courts hold warning labels to be defective if they fail to include all the possible consequences of failure to heed the label? Should manufacturers have to accommodate foreseeable misuse when they design their products?
    Plaintiff purchased a miter saw that was manufactured by the defendant. Despite the presence of seven warning labels in the operator's manual and on the saw itself, not to operate the saw with the blade guards removed, the plaintiff removed the guards in order to cut more deeply into a piece of wood. Shortly after removing the guards and continuing to run the saw, the spinning saw blade flew off the saw and injured the plaintiff. The plaintiff admitted reading the warning labels, but argued that the labels did not inform him of the risk of the saw flying off if the blade guards were removed. A similar incident had led to a prior lawsuit against the defendant, nearly two decades before the present events.
  5. 5 Show/Hide More Banks v. ICI Americas, Inc. -- "The Unlabeled Poison"
    Original Creator: Jonathan Zittrain Current Version: Lydia Lichlyter
    Should evidence of a ‘reasonable alternative design', alone, sufficiently establish products liability?
    The plaintiff parents' nine-year-old son died after ingesting an unlabeled poison, manufactured by the defendant.

Playlist Information

September 18, 2015

Author Stats

Lydia Lichlyter


Harvard Law School

Other Playlists by Lydia Lichlyter

Find Items

Search below to find items, then drag and drop items onto playlists you own. To add items to nested playlists, you must first expand those playlists.

Leitura Garamond Futura Verdana Proxima Nova Dagny Web
small medium large extra-large