XX.Supp. Supplemental Cases and Materials | Lydia Lichlyter | September 17, 2015

H2O

XX.Supp. Supplemental Cases and Materials

Original Creator: Jonathan Zittrain Current Version: Lydia Lichlyter Show/Hide
  1. 1 Show/Hide More Hector v. Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
    Original Creator: Jonathan Zittrain Current Version: Lydia Lichlyter

    Plaintiff is injured by a defective pacemaker that had been implanted at defendant’s hospital. The plaintiff’s physician had performed the implantation. The defendant had ordered the pacemaker and delivered it to the surgery room; however, the model and type of pacemaker was specified by the plaintiff’s physician.

    Should a hospital be liable for defects in the medical products it furnishes in connection with a patient’s care and treatment?

Close

Playlist Information

September 17, 2015

Author Stats

Lydia Lichlyter

Student

Harvard Law School

Other Playlists by Lydia Lichlyter

Find Items

Search below to find items, then drag and drop items onto playlists you own. To add items to nested playlists, you must first expand those playlists.

SEARCH
Leitura Garamond Futura Verdana Proxima Nova Dagny Web
small medium large extra-large