Anatomy of a Copyright Case | Griswold Reading Groups | May 06, 2016

H2O

This is the old version of the H2O platform and is now read-only. This means you can view content but cannot create content. You can access the new platform at https://opencasebook.org. Thank you.

Anatomy of a Copyright Case

Original Creator: bsobel Current Version: Griswold Reading Groups Show/Hide
Faculty: Henry B. Gutman This term we will explore the copyright treatment of computer software by examining together the litigation to protect the user interface of the spreadsheet program Lotus 1-2-3, the most popular application program of its time. We will begin with some background on the law, then proceed to consider the litigation Lotus filed against Paperback Software with respect to the first, self-proclaimed 1-2-3 clone and then address in detail the Lotus v. Borland case, which ended in a 4-4 tie in the Supreme Court. In addition to discussing the relevant legal and policy issues, we will focus on the nuts and bolts litigation questions that arose in the course of multiple trials, two arguments in the First Circuit and a closely watched Supreme Court case that failed to produce a decision. In our final class, we will fast forward to the present to consider the Federal Circuit’s recent decision in Oracle v. Google (for which a certiorari petition is now pending) addressing similar copyright questions, thirty years after the complaint in Lotus v. Paperback was filed. Time permitting we will also look briefly at how patent protection for computer software has evolved over the same period. Our class will meet on the following six dates, in Hauser 102 (unless otherwise noted): Wednesday, February 4th, 5-7pm. Wednesday, February 25, 5-7pm. FRIDAY, March 6, 3-5pm (during designated HLS make-up class period) (WCC 3018). Wednesday, March 11, 5-7pm. Wednesday, March 25, 5-7pm. Wednesday, April 8, 5-7pm. EDIT PLAYLIST INFORMATION DELETE PLAYLIST

Edit playlist item notes below to have a mix of public & private notes, or:

MAKE ALL NOTES PUBLIC (6/6 playlist item notes are public) MAKE ALL NOTES PRIVATE (0/6 playlist item notes are private)
  1. 1 Show/Hide More Week 1
    Original Creator: bsobel Current Version: Griswold Reading Groups
    1. 1.2 Show/Hide More Diamond v. Diehr
      Original Creator: bsobel Current Version: Griswold Reading Groups
    2. 1.3 Show/Hide More Baker v. Selden
      Original Creator: bsobel Current Version: Griswold Reading Groups
    3. 1.9 Show/Hide More Copyright Act: 17 U.S. Code § 101 - Definitions
      Original Creator: bsobel Current Version: Griswold Reading Groups
      Via http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/17/101
  2. 2 Show/Hide More Week 2
    Original Creator: bsobel Current Version: Griswold Reading Groups
  3. 3 Show/Hide More Week 3
    Original Creator: bsobel Current Version: Griswold Reading Groups
  4. 4 Show/Hide More Week 4
    Original Creator: bsobel Current Version: Griswold Reading Groups
  5. 5 Show/Hide More Week 5
    Original Creator: bsobel Current Version: Griswold Reading Groups
      1. 5.10.11 6dec1995.pdf
  6. 6 Show/Hide More Week 6
    Original Creator: bsobel Current Version: Griswold Reading Groups

Close

Playlist Information

May 06, 2016

Author Stats

Griswold Reading Groups

Harvard Law School

Other Playlists by Griswold Reading Groups

Find Items

Search below to find items, then drag and drop items onto playlists you own. To add items to nested playlists, you must first expand those playlists.

SEARCH
Leitura Garamond Futura Verdana Proxima Nova Dagny Web
small medium large extra-large