Unit Two: War and Peace | Samuel Moyn | June 28, 2016

H2O

This is the old version of the H2O platform and is now read-only. This means you can view content but cannot create content. You can access the new platform at https://opencasebook.org. Thank you.

Unit Two: War and Peace

by Samuel Moyn Show/Hide
    1. 1.2 Show/Hide More ICJ, Nicaragua v. United States, 1986 ICJ (1986), excerpt- part 1
      [During the Cold War the United States repeatedly intervened in Latin America, not to mention many other places, directly and by proxy (i.e., arming and training local actors, including paramilitary insurgents). In 1984, Nicaragua asked the ICJ to rule America’s assistance to the so-called contras illegal under international law, as a violation of Art. 2(4) of the United Nations Charter. The United States claimed its intervention was legal as an act of collective self-defense of neighboring countries. Eventually the United States withdrew from the case after losing in an early phase of the case; and, because of the nature of its own jurisdiction, the court could no longer rule directly on whether the United States had violated the Charter use of force rules. The court nonetheless resolved to rule on whether the United States had violated customary principles of the use of force, observing that the UN Charter rules “correspond, in essentials to those found in customary international law.” We are interested in the court’s analysis of Arts. 2(4) and 51, as mirroring the customary principles it was still empowered to interpret.]
    2. 1.3 Show/Hide More Daniel Webster, The Caroline Standard (1842)
      [In 1837, Canadian insurgents against the British empire took flight, and American confederates armed them, using the S.S. Caroline. Men loyal to the British crown seized the ship and destroyed it. Some of the insurgents and their confederates struck back, destroying a British ship while it was docked. In both instances state borders were crossed. In 1842, U.S. Secretary of State Daniel Webster made peace with the British, and in the course of negotiating agreed to what is now a famous norm of customary law norm concerning when self-defense allows anticipatory action against prospective armed attack.]
    1. 4.1 Show/Hide More Gareth Evans, “The Responsibility to Protect after Libya and Syria” (2012)
      Address by Professor the Hon Gareth Evans AC QC, Co-Chair, Global Centre for the Responsibility to Protect, to Annual Castan Centre for Human Rights Law Conference, Melbourne, 20 July 2012
    1. 5.2 Show/Hide More Janina Dill, “Applying the Principle of Proportionality in Combat Operations” (2010)
      [International humanitarian law dictates that collateral damage (civilian death included) of lawful attacks not outweigh anticipated military advantage.]
    1. 6.4 Show/Hide More Naz Modirzadeh, “A Reply to Marty Lederman,” Lawfare, October 3, 2014, excerpts
      full post: https://www.lawfareblog.com/reply-marty-lederman
Close

Playlist Information

June 28, 2016

Author Stats

Samuel Moyn

Harvard Law School

Other Playlists by Samuel Moyn

Find Items

Search below to find items, then drag and drop items onto playlists you own. To add items to nested playlists, you must first expand those playlists.

SEARCH
Leitura Garamond Futura Verdana Proxima Nova Dagny Web
small medium large extra-large