This is the old version of the H2O platform and is now read-only. This means you can view content but cannot create content. You can access the new platform at https://opencasebook.org. Thank you.
In the earliest general corporation statutes, statutory mergers required the unanimous approval of stockholders. Part of the reasoning for the unanimity requirement was that accomlishment of the statutory merger would necesarily deprive all stockholders of their interests in the corporation, even those stockholders who do not wish to separate from the corporation. Under the unanimity rule mergers were rare, in part because a minority of stockholders could always hold up a transaction.
Over time, approval requirements were liberalized. Now, only a majority of the outstanding shares are required to vote in favor of a merger for it to be approved. The policy exchange for liberalized approval regimes included the additional of appraisal rights to the statute. In a statutory merger, some stockholders may vote no because they beleive that the consideration being offered in the transaction does not represent what they believe to be fair value for their stock. When that is the case, such stockholders have the right to seek a judicial appraisal of their stock.
In an appraisal proceeding, a judge is asked to rule on the fair value of stock at issue in a merger transaction. A judge is not asked to rule on fiduciary duty claims or the propriety of the merger transaction, only whether the consideration offered in the transaction represented “fair value” for the stock. If teh judge determines that the fair value is higher than the consideration offered, then the surviving corporation in the transaction will make payment for the difference between the fair value and the merger consideration to any and all stockholders who have perfected their appraisal rights and sought a judicial appraisal.EDIT PLAYLIST INFORMATION DELETE PLAYLIST
Edit playlist item notes below to have a mix of public & private notes, or:MAKE ALL NOTES PUBLIC (2/2 playlist item notes are public) MAKE ALL NOTES PRIVATE (0/2 playlist item notes are private)
|2||Show/Hide More||Weinberger v. UOP, Inc.|
June 14, 2016
Brian JM Quinn
This is the old version of the H2O platform and is now read-only. This means you can view content but cannot create content. If you would like access to the new version of the H2O platform and have not already been contacted by a member of our team, please contact us at email@example.com. Thank you.