This is the old version of the H2O platform and is now read-only. This means you can view content but cannot create content. You can access the new platform at https://opencasebook.org. Thank you.
Welcome!
We will spend most of the 3rd session of the course continuing with the introduction that we began in the first session, with a focus on judicial review. In the 3rd hour, we will delve into our first case, which comes courtesy of Professor Pamela Karlan's course in torts.
For readings, please read Scott v. Harris in the link below. The videos are optional.
Edited to add: you may find the article by Orin Kerr, “How to Read a Legal Opinion,” of interest for this session, so it is now posted here now as well. It will be assigned formally for a different session, and is optional for this one. Note that the Kerr document may download automatically when you click on the link.
Edit playlist item notes below to have a mix of public & private notes, or:
MAKE ALL NOTES PUBLIC (4/4 playlist item notes are public) MAKE ALL NOTES PRIVATE (0/4 playlist item notes are private)1 | Show/Hide More | Scott v. Harris |
2 | Show/Hide More | Scott v. Harris: The Chase Video |
3 | Show/Hide More | Scott v. Harris "Why I Ran Video" |
4 | Show/Hide More | How to Read a Legal Opinion |
September 07, 2016
Maria Green
Visiting Professor
Raoul Wallenberg Institute of Human Rights and Humanitarian Law
Find Items |
Search below to find items, then drag and drop items onto playlists you own. To add items to nested playlists, you must first expand those playlists.
This is the old version of the H2O platform and is now read-only. This means you can view content but cannot create content. If you would like access to the new version of the H2O platform and have not already been contacted by a member of our team, please contact us at h2o@cyber.law.harvard.edu. Thank you.