This is the old version of the H2O platform and is now read-only. This means you can view content but cannot create content. You can access the new platform at https://opencasebook.org. Thank you.
Various factors – including lengthened copyright term, elimination of the registration requirement, and increased ability to access works – have led to stresses in the copyright system and opportunities for legal and technological innovation. Enter Google Books. We will examine the legal landscape that brought about the project, the agreements with libraries that made it possible, and the two resulting lawsuits that followed. [first half of class]
Disputes between content owners and technology innovators have long played a central role in the development of copyright law and business models for content. Several of those battles, particularly in the digital age, have been resolved in nontraditional and creative ways outside the courtroom. We will look in particular at the resolution of lawsuits involving the digital audio tape (DAT) recorder and YouTube, which included both legal and extralegal solutions. [second half of class]EDIT PLAYLIST INFORMATION DELETE PLAYLIST
Edit playlist item notes below to have a mix of public & private notes, or:MAKE ALL NOTES PUBLIC (21/21 playlist item notes are public) MAKE ALL NOTES PRIVATE (0/21 playlist item notes are private)
|2||Show/Hide More||Google - University of Michigan Cooperative Agreement (2004)|
September 24, 2017
Stanford Law School
This is the old version of the H2O platform and is now read-only. This means you can view content but cannot create content. If you would like access to the new version of the H2O platform and have not already been contacted by a member of our team, please contact us at firstname.lastname@example.org. Thank you.