XI.A. Action Versus Inaction | Scott Soloway | March 09, 2018

H2O

This is the old version of the H2O platform and is now read-only. This means you can view content but cannot create content. You can access the new platform at https://opencasebook.org. Thank you.

XI.A. Action Versus Inaction

Original Creator: Jonathan Zittrain Current Version: Scott Soloway Show/Hide
  1. 1 Show/Hide More Moch Co. v. Rensselaer Water Co.--"The Failure to Supply Water During a Fire"
    Original Creator: Jonathan Zittrain Current Version: Scott Soloway
    In questions of duty, should courts draw a distinction between inaction that has the consequence of harm, and positive action that creates harm?
  2. 2 Show/Hide More Union Pacific Railway v. Cappier--"The Railroad that Ran Over a Man and Let Him Bleed to Death"
    Original Creator: Jonathan Zittrain Current Version: Scott Soloway
    Should non-negligent owners and operators of an instrumentality have a duty to assist individuals who are harmed by the instrumentality?
Close

Playlist Information

March 09, 2018

Author Stats

Scott Soloway

business lawyer practicing law

Boston

Other Playlists by Scott Soloway

Find Items

Search below to find items, then drag and drop items onto playlists you own. To add items to nested playlists, you must first expand those playlists.

SEARCH
Leitura Garamond Futura Verdana Proxima Nova Dagny Web
small medium large extra-large