II. Elements of Just Punishment | Joe Srednicki | July 10, 2014

H2O

II. Elements of Just Punishment

Original Creator: Jeannie Suk Current Version: Joe Srednicki Show/Hide
  1. 1 Show/Hide More II.C. Mens Rea
    Original Creator: Jeannie Suk Current Version: Joe Srednicki

    Mens rea—a guilty mind—is the second part of criminal culpability, and undoubtedly one of the most complex subjects we will study in this course. Intricately tied into concepts of blameworthiness, mens rea can determine whether the same conduct and result constitute a blameless accident or a capital offense.

    The cases and readings in this section represent a range of mens rea categories, from a lack of mens rea to various grades of mens rea: negligence, recklessness, knowledge, and purpose. As you will see here and throughout this course, there are gradations and exceptions even within these categories.

    The questions these cases raise are fundamental to the study of criminal law. As you read through them, consider why each crime requires the mens rea that is attached to it, whether you think that requirement is fair, and the impact of the mens rea requirement on the enforcement of the law. How would the crime have been adjudicated under different mens rea requirements? Does the requirement track your sense of moral blameworthiness?

    1. 1.2 Show/Hide More Regina v. Cunningham
      Original Creator: Jeannie Suk Current Version: Joe Srednicki
    2. 1.3 Show/Hide More United States v. Jewell
      Original Creator: Jeannie Suk Current Version: Joe Srednicki
    3. 1.4 Show/Hide More Regina v. Prince
      Original Creator: Jeannie Suk Current Version: Joe Srednicki
    4. 1.5 Show/Hide More Garnett v. State
      Original Creator: Jeannie Suk Current Version: Joe Srednicki
    5. 1.8 Show/Hide More People v. Marrero
      Original Creator: Jeannie Suk Current Version: Joe Srednicki
    6. 1.9 Show/Hide More II.C.i Strict Liability
      Original Creator: Jeannie Suk Current Version: Joe Srednicki

      As we already discovered in the last section in Garnett v. State, some crimes do not require any mens rea. Such “strict liability” crimes can result in punishment for an act alone. While mens rea is typically a crucial part of defining blameworthiness in criminal law, strict liability crimes are often more concerned with regulating behavior than punishing the most blameworthy offenders.

      The following cases explore this idea. As you read them, consider why a lawmaker might choose to create a strict liability crime, and why a court might allow one. Are certain kinds of crime particularly apt to be strict liability offenses? What effect does removing the mens rea requirement have, and what expectations does it impose upon people?

      1. 1.9.1 Show/Hide More United States v. Balint
        Original Creator: Jeannie Suk Current Version: Joe Srednicki
      2. 1.9.2 Show/Hide More United States v. Dotterweich
        Original Creator: Jeannie Suk Current Version: Joe Srednicki
      3. 1.9.3 Show/Hide More State v. Phillips
        Original Creator: Jeannie Suk Current Version: Joe Srednicki
      4. 1.9.4 Show/Hide More Staples v. United States
        Original Creator: Jeannie Suk Current Version: Joe Srednicki
  2. 2 Show/Hide More II.B. Actus Reus
    Original Creator: Jeannie Suk Current Version: Joe Srednicki

    Actus reus, or the act requirement, is the first part of culpability in criminal law. (You will meet the second part, mens rea, in the next section.) In short, almost every crime must have an act, but defining that act can be tricky. Sometimes something that seems like an act isn’t an act; other times, something that does not seem like an act is one.

    These cases introduce you to the act requirement. Notice distinctions between voluntary and involuntary acts, and between conduct and the results of conduct. Consider why the court reaches the decision it does in each case, and what its decision says about its concept of blameworthiness.

    1. 2.1 Show/Hide More Martin v. State
      Original Creator: Jeannie Suk Current Version: Joe Srednicki
    2. 2.2 Show/Hide More People v. Decina
      Original Creator: Jeannie Suk Current Version: Joe Srednicki
    3. 2.3 Show/Hide More People v. Newton
      Original Creator: Jeannie Suk Current Version: Joe Srednicki
    4. 2.4 Show/Hide More II.B.i Acts v. Omissions
      Original Creator: Jeannie Suk Current Version: Joe Srednicki

      When is not acting an act?

      One of the most fraught distinctions in criminal law has been the act/omission distinction. For most people, punishing inaction in certain situations seems to flow naturally out of the sense of blameworthiness that underpins much of criminal law. However, defining the criminal act when it is not an act raises problems.

      As a general rule, there is no criminal liability for omissions. The following cases and readings consider the exceptions to this rule, whether they arise from statutorily created duties, special moral relationships, contractual relationships, or the voluntary assumption of responsibilities. As you will see, in some cases, criminalizing omissions likely tracks your moral intuitions. In others, you may feel more conflicted. Consider why different scenarios imply different levels of blameworthiness, but also what goals or behaviors society may seek to promote by assigning affirmative duties to act.

      1. 2.4.1 Show/Hide More Pope v. State
        Original Creator: Jeannie Suk Current Version: Joe Srednicki
      2. 2.4.2 Show/Hide More People v. Stephens
        Original Creator: Jeannie Suk Current Version: Joe Srednicki
      3. 2.4.3 Show/Hide More People v. Beardsley
        Original Creator: Jeannie Suk Current Version: Joe Srednicki
Close

Playlist Information

July 10, 2014

Author Stats

Joe Srednicki

Contract Technical Writer

Independent contractor

Other Playlists by Joe Srednicki

Find Items

Search below to find items, then drag and drop items onto playlists you own. To add items to nested playlists, you must first expand those playlists.

SEARCH
Leitura Garamond Futura Verdana Proxima Nova Dagny Web
small medium large extra-large