H2O

II.B. Actus Reus

Original Creator: Jeannie Suk Current Version: Joe Srednicki Show/Hide

Actus reus, or the act requirement, is the first part of culpability in criminal law. (You will meet the second part, mens rea, in the next section.) In short, almost every crime must have an act, but defining that act can be tricky. Sometimes something that seems like an act isn’t an act; other times, something that does not seem like an act is one.

These cases introduce you to the act requirement. Notice distinctions between voluntary and involuntary acts, and between conduct and the results of conduct. Consider why the court reaches the decision it does in each case, and what its decision says about its concept of blameworthiness.

EDIT PLAYLIST INFORMATION DELETE PLAYLIST

Edit playlist item notes below to have a mix of public & private notes, or:

MAKE ALL NOTES PUBLIC (3/4 playlist item notes are public) MAKE ALL NOTES PRIVATE (1/4 playlist item notes are private)
  1. 1 Show/Hide More Martin v. State
    Original Creator: Jeannie Suk Current Version: Joe Srednicki
  2. 2 Show/Hide More People v. Decina
    Original Creator: Jeannie Suk Current Version: Joe Srednicki
  3. 3 Show/Hide More People v. Newton
    Original Creator: Jeannie Suk Current Version: Joe Srednicki
  4. 4 Show/Hide More II.B.i Acts v. Omissions
    Original Creator: Jeannie Suk Current Version: Joe Srednicki

    When is not acting an act?

    One of the most fraught distinctions in criminal law has been the act/omission distinction. For most people, punishing inaction in certain situations seems to flow naturally out of the sense of blameworthiness that underpins much of criminal law. However, defining the criminal act when it is not an act raises problems.

    As a general rule, there is no criminal liability for omissions. The following cases and readings consider the exceptions to this rule, whether they arise from statutorily created duties, special moral relationships, contractual relationships, or the voluntary assumption of responsibilities. As you will see, in some cases, criminalizing omissions likely tracks your moral intuitions. In others, you may feel more conflicted. Consider why different scenarios imply different levels of blameworthiness, but also what goals or behaviors society may seek to promote by assigning affirmative duties to act.

    1. 4.1 Show/Hide More Pope v. State
      Original Creator: Jeannie Suk Current Version: Joe Srednicki
    2. 4.2 Show/Hide More People v. Stephens
      Original Creator: Jeannie Suk Current Version: Joe Srednicki
    3. 4.3 Show/Hide More People v. Beardsley
      Original Creator: Jeannie Suk Current Version: Joe Srednicki
Close

Playlist Information

July 10, 2014

Author Stats

Joe Srednicki

Contract Technical Writer

Independent contractor

Other Playlists by Joe Srednicki

Find Items

Search below to find items, then drag and drop items onto playlists you own. To add items to nested playlists, you must first expand those playlists.

SEARCH
Leitura Garamond Futura Verdana Proxima Nova Dagny Web
small medium large extra-large