Proxy Access and Expense Bylaws | Brian JM Quinn | July 31, 2014


This is the old version of the H2O platform and is now read-only. This means you can view content but cannot create content. You can access the new platform at Thank you.

Proxy Access and Expense Bylaws

Original Creator: Brian JM Quinn Current Version: Brian JM Quinn Show/Hide

Although corporate bylaws are typically limited to process, they can still be extremely powerful in determining the balance of internal corporate governance. For example, although stockholders are required to vote for the board of directors, unless stockholders have the ability to nominate candidates the director positions, the power to vote might appear somewhat meaningless. Consequently, the ability to nominate directors to the corporate ballot is an extremely important power.  Without access to the corporate-sponsered ballot, stockholders are often left only rubber stamping board decisions about who is able to run for a seat on the board of directors. 

Of course stockholders are always free to run a “proxy contest” by sponsering their own proxy ballot, however the mechanics of such a contest are prohibitively expensive for all but the largest stockolders.   

In response to efforts by the SEC to enforce a blanket rule opening up access to the corporate-sponsered proxy to all stockholders, Delaware adopted permissive rules that on the one hand make it possible for corporations to opt to adopt bylaws making access to the corporate proxy available to stockholders under certain conditions.

Delaware also adopted rules that allow corporations to adopt bylaws to permit the reimbursement of election expenses for successful candidates. Reimbursement bylaws are intended to reduce the financial hurdles for independent board candidates to run against incumbent directors. 

Both of these changes – proxy access and reimbursement bylaws - are indended to reduce the incentives against stockholders nominating and running their own candidates for seats on boards and thereby make boards more responsive to stockholder interests. 


Edit playlist item notes below to have a mix of public & private notes, or:

MAKE ALL NOTES PUBLIC (2/2 playlist item notes are public) MAKE ALL NOTES PRIVATE (0/2 playlist item notes are private)
  1. 1 Show/Hide More DGCL Sec. 112 - Proxy Access Bylaw
    Original Creator: Brian JM Quinn Current Version: Brian JM Quinn
    Section 112 permits boards to adopt bylaws that give stockholders the right, under certain conditions, to nominate their own directors who will appear on the corporate sponsered proxy.
  2. 2 Show/Hide More DGCL Sec. 113 - Proxy Expense Bylaw
    Original Creator: Brian JM Quinn Current Version: Brian JM Quinn
    Section 113 reduces the economic incentives against stockholders engaging in proxy contests by permitting expense reimbursement following proxy contest for successful candidates.

Playlist Information

March 15, 2017

Author Stats

Brian JM Quinn

Other Playlists by Brian JM Quinn

Find Items

Search below to find items, then drag and drop items onto playlists you own. To add items to nested playlists, you must first expand those playlists.

Leitura Garamond Futura Verdana Proxima Nova Dagny Web
small medium large extra-large