This is the old version of the H2O platform and is now read-only. This means you can view content but cannot create content. You can access the new platform at https://opencasebook.org. Thank you.
In Sony BMG Entertainment v. Tenenbaum, 719 F.3d 67 (1st Cir. 2013), the court considered another appeal. On remand from the prior case, the district court held that:
1. Remittitur was not proper in this case, and
2. Copyright statutory damages did not violate constitutional due process.
Tenenbaum did not appeal the remittitur, but did appeal on constitutional grounds. The appeals court agreed with the district court (as it had hinted it would in its prior opinion) that statutory damages did not violate due process.
This is the old version of the H2O platform and is now read-only. This means you can view content but cannot create content. If you would like access to the new version of the H2O platform and have not already been contacted by a member of our team, please contact us at email@example.com. Thank you.