This is the old version of the H2O platform and is now read-only. This means you can view content but cannot create content. You can access the new platform at https://opencasebook.org. Thank you.
567 Annotated Items, 426 Links, 215 Playlists, 2 Media Total
08/30/2013 added by h2ocopyright
08/30/2013 added by h2ocopyright
08/30/2013 added by h2ocopyright
h2ocopyright | 0 Words | August 30, 2013
h2ocopyright | 262,605 Words | August 30, 2013
h2ocopyright | 48,934 Words | August 30, 2013
h2ocopyright | 0 Words | August 28, 2013
h2ocopyright | 66,654 Words | August 28, 2013
h2ocopyright | 110,718 Words | August 28, 2013
08/28/2013 added by h2ocopyright
(more)This instance of sampling raises questions about the "amount and substantiality" test. The sampled portion comprises just a single note, but it is quite an identifiable note. Could the expression of a single note ever be so unique as to be protected by copyright? (less)
This is the old version of the H2O platform and is now read-only. This means you can view content but cannot create content. If you would like access to the new version of the H2O platform and have not already been contacted by a member of our team, please contact us at h2o@cyber.law.harvard.edu. Thank you.